Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27112202-20160717025407/@comment-27112202-20160722204647

But you said in your edit summary that nobody refers to it that way, and yet a large number of players seem to. Even if it is a launcher somehow, you should say "its playstyle is like a grenade launcher, not a mortar." From what I've seen in-game and the forums, most people think of it as a mortar and as such, people not thinking of it that way is not a valid reason to revert an edit immediately. Having an edit reverted so rapidly without any summary of the proof behind the revert is very, very, very irritating to me. Especially when I have asked in-game several times about what the Bulldog is before making the edit. I did research specifically to see if the edit was neccessary. I determined it was and so I did it only to find that it had been reverted by someone claiming the opposite of pretty much everyone I had previously consultedand who claimed that those other people had said that.

This is a wiki. It isn't what you think it is or what it plays like (or else we'd call the Prowler an IFV or some other weird funky support vehicle, not an MBT), this is what it is according to the info released by the devs. They intended the Prowler to technically an MBT, so that's what it is, even if it plays in a way that is definitely not tank-like. Same for the Bulldog. If they changed the weapon type of the Railjack to "sword" as a serious change, that's what it would be.