Talk:Empires/@comment-109.35.120.116-20140130094849/@comment-130.204.172.136-20140612100540

I'm an all-out battlefield player. Although I have some experience in CoD(3-4 games at most, with fewer than 50 hours each), I can agree on the infantry part. Although Battlefield also requires you to be weary of pesky snipers and rushing LMGs and Shotgunners, it has remarkably increased my survivability tenfold against Tanks and Aircraft. However, since the most important aspect is still mano a mano in shooters, I would say CoD based players have a bigger advantage in terms of accuracy and reflex, while also being better against infantry. So to sum it up it's like this :

Battlefield players: Survivability, flanking, tactical thinking and team cooperation.

Cod players: Accuracy, relfex, bonus against infantry enemies, as well as a certain degree of knifing skills. Hey, they're useful too.

Both: A fucking one-man army that can be both a leader and a soldier if needed. Best thing about it is that having Survival instincts while being a gunslinger is a rare skill which defines the players who have played actively both games.