Talk:TMG-50/@comment-108.84.77.227-20170204123309

OK gun. It's more like a EM6. It has a same exact horizontal recoil characteristics as the EM6. Not a true long range LMG. Beyond 40 meters, the gun's ability to keep the barrel centered at the enemy becomes compromised by it's wide horizontal tolerance. It's basically a EM6 that doesn't lack the bullet velocity of the EM6, which is one of the weakness of the weapon when targeting enemies at extended ranges. TMG-50 is not a bad gun, it does has it's upsides versus the EM6, but is it long range? No. I don't see any real use for sights higher than 2x. You can maybe go for 3.4x scope. 4x scope and 6x scope isn't worth it at all for this weapon in my opinion. 2x burst mode not particulary useful at those longer ranges either.

T-32 Bull is going to be more reliable at over 40 meters, because it's default horizontal tolerance is better than the TMG-50's horizontal tolerance with a forward grip. 0.525 of the TMG-50 versus the default 0.5 of the T32 Bull. The Bull is going to shoot straighter. The Bull's problem is cone of fire, which you really feel at long ranges. TR don't have any particularly good long range weapons. The VS have the Ursa, which does work at long ranges. Easily better than anything the TR have. NC have the Gauss SAW if the player can manage it's vertical recoil.