Talk:Pulsar VS1/@comment-108.84.77.227-20170301160012

Pulsar VS1 is not a accurate weapon. It has a combination of factors that doesn't make it accurate. It has two directions where it's vertical recoil can go combined with it's first shot multiplier, there's no way you can predict which of two directions the vertical recoil can kick during the first shot, which throws off your second and third shot.. This wouldn't be as problematic if the weapon had good horizontal tolerance, which it doesn't. It's horizontal recoil is moderate, not high like the T1 Cycler. What makes the Solstic a good weapon is the fact during sustain fire, the weapon will not swing, or wonder off. It's going to shoot straight no matter what. It's horizontal tolerance is 0.5, not 0.7, which is a big. To give you an idea how big 0.7 horizontal tolerance is, with a grip of 25% reduction, it becomes 0.525 like the Gauss SAW without it's advance forward grip, and the TMG-50 with a grip. TMG-50 has no complicated angular vertical and it's cone of fire is superior. Just pull straight down. There's no trickery to compensating for vertical recoil with those LMGs.

I don't recommend going for head shots with this, it's not going to be reliable. Other weapons that you are going up against will likely be better than the Pulsar VS1. In the case of the NC1 Gauss Rifle, flat out superior. Gauss Rifle has angular vertical as well, but it's horizontal tolerance is 0.4, with better horizontal recoil, and cone of fire. Gauss Rifle is superior in both burst, and sustained fire over the Pulsar VS1. You will lose if you try to do marksmen duels against other weapons. Instead you go for body shots with center aim, and shorten your burst when you see the weapon swinging off to the side to re-center.

Pulsar LSW, the LMG version of the Pulsar class is better at ADS, because at least it gives you something extra, that low bloom. If the Pulsar VS1 had that low bloom, it would be a good weapon giving better sustained fire accuracy.